Skip to main content
· 7/19/1966

Cassell v. Pfaifer

Citations

  • 221 A.2d 668
  • 243 Md. 447
  • 1966 Md. LEXIS 544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the evidence offered “lack[ed] that degree of substantiality which would require us to affirm the trial court” and the court’s factual finding was, therefore, clearly erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hammond, Horney, Oppenheimer, Barnes, McWilliams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.