· 1/13/2011
Cassel v. Superior Court
Citations
- 51 Cal. 4th 113
- 244 P.3d 1080
- 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 437
- 2011 Cal. LEXIS 2
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting rule and holding that communications between a disputant and his or her own counsel are confidential mediation communications, notwithstanding that they occur without either the mediator or other disputants present
- interpreting rule and holding that communica- tions between a disputant and his or her own counsel are confidential mediation communications, notwithstanding that they occur without either the mediator or other disputants present
- “We must apply the plain terms of the mediation confidentiality statutes to the facts of this case unless such a result would violate due process, or would lead to absurd results that clearly undermine the statutory purpose.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baxter, Chin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.