Skip to main content
· 1/13/2011

Cassel v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 51 Cal. 4th 113
  • 244 P.3d 1080
  • 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 437
  • 2011 Cal. LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting rule and holding that communications between a disputant and his or her own counsel are confidential mediation communications, notwithstanding that they occur without either the mediator or other disputants present
  • interpreting rule and holding that communica- tions between a disputant and his or her own counsel are confidential mediation communications, notwithstanding that they occur without either the mediator or other disputants present
  • “We must apply the plain terms of the mediation confidentiality statutes to the facts of this case unless such a result would violate due process, or would lead to absurd results that clearly undermine the statutory purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baxter, Chin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.