Cassano v. Gogos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiffs demand letter insufficient because it failed to give defendant either explicit or implicit notice of a consumer protection statute violation
• determining pre-suit notice requirement not satisfied because “[n]othing . . . characterizes the claim as one under the consumer protection statute
• failure of builder to construct house in good and workmanlike manner so as to prevent water seepage constituted breach of express warranty
• statutory demand letter with clear notice of the nature of the 93A claim is essential to serve the statutory purpose of encouraging settlements
• in order to qualify as a written demand under c. 93A, the demand must... define the injury suffered and the relief sought, as well as refer to the nature of the claim as one under the consumer protection act
• in the context of G.L.c. 93A, §9

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).