Massachusetts Appeals Court· 7/11/1985

Cassano v. Gogos

Citations

480 N.E.2d 649
20 Mass. App. Ct. 348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding plaintiffs demand letter insufficient because it failed to give defendant either explicit or implicit notice of a consumer protection statute violation
determining pre-suit notice requirement not satisfied because “[n]othing . . . characterizes the claim as one under the consumer protection statute
failure of builder to construct house in good and workmanlike manner so as to prevent water seepage constituted breach of express warranty
statutory demand letter with clear notice of the nature of the 93A claim is essential to serve the statutory purpose of encouraging settlements
in order to qualify as a written demand under c. 93A, the demand must... define the injury suffered and the relief sought, as well as refer to the nature of the claim as one under the consumer protection act
in the context of G.L.c. 93A, §9

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pbrretta, Kass, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.