Skip to main content
· 8/24/1994

Cassady v. Souris River Telephone Cooperative

Citations

  • 520 N.W.2d 803
  • 1994 N.D. LEXIS 185
  • 1994 WL 458612

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding in that case “any financial interest individual members might have is essentially de minimis”
  • deciding in that case \any financial interest individual members might have is essentially de minimis\
  • upholding trial court’s ruling that would not allow a blanket disqualification based solely on cooperative membership
  • upholding trial court's ruling that would not allow a blanket disqualification based solely on cooperative membership

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sandstrom, Vande Walle, Levine, Erickstad, Pederson, Neumann, Meschke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.