Cason v. GIBSON

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• additional sustaining grounds submitted, but not briefed, “need not be particularly considered”
• plaintiff was held to have a private easement in a street which was described in a plat referred to in the deed to his property, although the street was unnamed on the plat
• rejecting on the merits contentions not argued in respondent’s brief
• contentions not argued in the brief need not be considered
• contentions not argued in the brief need not be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).