Casole v. Johanns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff failed to exhaust his claim of national origin discrimination where he had asserted only gender discrimination and retaliation in his administrative complaint
• holding that a 13 plaintiff who asserted only gender discrimination and retaliation in his administrative complaint had not exhausted administrative remedies with respect to a claim of discrimination based on national origin
• holding that the plaintiff had failed to exhaust a discrimination claim on the basis of national origin, although it arose from same incidents as the gender discrimination and retaliation claims properly raised in his administrative complaint
• finding that the plaintiffs protected activity, which was ongoing when the alleged retaliation occurred, precluded dismissal based on lack of causation
• finding that the plaintiff's protected activity, which was ongoing when the alleged retaliation occurred, precluded dismissal based on lack of 50 causation
• recognizing continued protection during the course of ongoing “EEO-protected activities” and not just at the time when the complaint was filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).