Skip to main content
· 4/20/2007

Casner v. State

Citations

  • 155 P.3d 1202
  • 37 Kan. App. 2d 667
  • 2007 Kan. App. LEXIS 491
  • 2007 WL 1159713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that there is no fundamental fairness exception to a jurisdictional statute
  • determining the defendant was not fully informed of his rights on appeal when he was told he could appeal but was not informed he had the right to an attorney on appeal
  • first exception of Ortiz satisfied when sentencing court fails to fully inform of right to appointed counsel on appeal; State cannot cross-appeal from ruling at Ortiz hearing on ground of fundamental fairness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rulon, Malone, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.