Skip to main content
· 3/18/1996

Caskey v. Man Roland

Citations

  • 83 F.3d 418
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11102
  • 1996 WL 197370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “district court violated its discretion in failing to invoke the mandatory exclusion sanction of Rule 37(c)(1)” by not excluding defendant's surveillance tape requested by plaintiff during discovery, but presented by defendant for the first time at trial
  • ―[O]ne of the purposes of open discovery is to promote settlement.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.