· 1/17/1985
Casio, Inc. v. S.M. & R. Co., Inc.
Citations
- 755 F.2d 528
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27982
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that if the answer denies a jurisdictional allegation, the allegations must be “determined like that of any other contested allegation in the lawsuit”
- stating that even after the district court had rendered a decision on the merits, defendant was not too late to question the court’s jurisdiction with a motion to dismiss
- “[T]he plaintiff must allege both the state of incorporation and the state of the principal place of busi- ness for each corporation.”
- parties func- tionally stipulated to the law by not objecting
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Posner, Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.