CASINO REINVESTMENT DEV. v. Hauck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court's reliance on Rule 4:42-11 where \interest rates had remained stable during the pendency of these proceedings\
• affirming application of the court rule interest rate where the rate was stable throughout condemnation proceedings, and the defendant contributed to the length of the proceedings by unreasonably demanding an award twice the amount of the jury verdict
• affirming application of the court rule interest rate where the rate was stable throughout condemnation proceedings, and the defendant contributed to the length of the proceedings by unreasonably demanding an award twice the amount of the jury verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).