Casino Airlines, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a petition for review because the agency’s decision shows that there is no reasonable dispute that the agency relied on an independent, valid reason rather than the invalid reason
• upholding agency decision where agency’s “language could have been more direct,” but any “fair reading” would reveal that the agency based its decision “at least in part” on a specific ground
• “We have consistently held that when an agency relies on multiple grounds for its decision, some of which are invalid, we may nonetheless sustain the decision as long as one is valid and the agency would clearly have acted on that ground even if the other were unavailable.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).