Casiano v. AT&T Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a Title VII case may be a “quid pro quo” case or a “hostile environment” case
• explaining that where employee has suffered a “tangible employment action,” her suit is classified as a quid pro quo case and the affirmative defense is not available
• explaining that in a “quid pro quo” case “the court must determine whether the tangible employment action suffered by the employee resulted from his acceptance or rejection of his supervisor's alleged sexual harassment”
• discussing the two forms of Title VII sexual harassment claims: (1) quid pro quo claims which involve a tangible employment action; and (2
• discussing a harassment claim including that a senior employee asked plaintiff “to bring her personal items such as drinks and food”
• finding no tangible employment action when an employee was denied access to a training program because another manager, not the harassing manager, was responsible for the decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).