Cashwell v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co., LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an unauthorized intrusion only inches inside a home is “an actual intrusion into a constitutionally protected area”
• holding that the right to privacy at home is “[a]t the very core” of what the Fourth Amendment seeks to protect
• holding that a Fourth Amendment search occurred when police inserted a “spike mike” into a house to overhear conversations of the house next door
• holding that an unauthorized intrusion only inches inside a home is “an actual intrusion into a constitutionally protected area”
• holding that an unauthorized intrusion only inches inside a home is “an actual intrusion into a constitutionally protected area”
• recognizing that at Fourth Amendment’s “very core” stands “the right of a man to retreat into his own home and there be free from unreasonable governmental intrusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).