Cashman v. Sullivan & Donegan P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \An award will not be vacated on the ground that the construction placed on the facts or the interpretation of the agreement by the arbitrator was erroneous.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• White v. Kampner
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-04-20· cited 8×
• Cashman v. Sullivan & Donegan, P.C.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-10-04

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-04-14· cited 148×
• Bic Pen Corporation v. Local No. 134
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-04-21· cited 120×
• Bennett v. Meader
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-07-19· cited 68×
• Waterbury Board of Education v. Waterbury Teachers Assn.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-03-04· cited 59×
• Town of East Hartford v. East Hartford Municipal Employees Union, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-03-22· cited 31×
• Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. v. Southern New England Contracting Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-03-08· cited 29×
• Town of East Hartford v. East Hartford Municipal Employees Union, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-05-05· cited 8×

Other cases named Cashman v. Sullivan & Donegan P.C.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Cashman v. Sullivan & Donegan, P.C.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-10-04