· 10/13/2022

Cashelmara Condominium Unit Owners Assn., Inc. v. Kish

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 3672

Syllabus

Injunction continuing jurisdiction burden to update address with court pro se litigant decline to review issues raised for the first time on appeal Civ.R. 60(B)(3) proper service and rebuttable presumption. Where the trial court granted a preliminary and permanent injunction and the corresponding judgment entry stated the court retained jurisdiction, the trial court had continuing jurisdiction to enforce the injunction and related motions. Even after the court granted the injunction, the parties bore the burden to notify the court of a change in address. Issues raised for the first time on appeal are not properly before the appellate court and will not be reviewed. The trial court did not err when it found that the evidence did not show fraud or misconduct and, therefore, denied appellants' Civ.R. 60(B)(3) motion.

Judges: Kilbane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.