Cash v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[A] party is no longer required to renew an objection made in a motion in limine at trial.\ (citing § 90.104(1), Fla. Stat. (2003))
• \We note that a party is no longer required to renew an objection made in a motion in limine at trial.\ (citing § 90.104(1), Fla. Stat. (2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Suiter v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-03-28
• Alonso v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-07-09

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Giglio v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
• Guzman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-11-20· cited 147×
• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-10· cited 64×
• Evans v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-10-11· cited 40×
• Coffee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-17· cited 5×
• Gaiter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-07· cited 3×