Cash v. Municipal Court of San Francisco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Title IV-D creates rights that are enforceable under § 1983, but that the Secretary's oversight power forecloses a § 1983 remedy
• noting that a statute may have more than one class of beneficiaries and this does not preclude Sec. 1983 enforcement
• rejecting ______ Wehunt; finding that Title IV-D was intended both \to protect ____ needy families with children [and to protect] the public fisc\
• avoiding the question by holding that plaintiffs had failed to state a cognizable claim
• “States are required to provide child support enforcement services to families that receive AFDC benefits as well as families that do not”
• comprehensive review of OCSE duties and authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).