Cash v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• witnesses admitted to perjury before grand jury and were given opportunity to “respond[] truthfully and honestly to all the questions at trial”
• per RCr 9.22, a party is required to make “known to the court the action he desires the court to take or his objection to the action of the court” and failure to do so renders an error unpreserved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barth v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2001-10-25· cited 56×
• Commonwealth v. Blincoe
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2000-12-22· cited 3×
• Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Cornell Denmark Thomas, II
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2025-12-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• West v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1989-10-06· cited 85×
• Workman v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1979-01-16· cited 50×
• Morton v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1991-08-29· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1981-07-07· cited 33×
• Bowers v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1977-05-20· cited 14×