Cash v. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the common law standard traditionally used in deciding whether an individual can claim employee status emphasizes the importance of an employer's control over the individual.
• stating that the common law standard traditionally used in deciding whether an individual can claim employee status emphasizes the importance of an employer's control over the individual.
• requiring the Attorney General to give his or her opinion to various public servants and entities on constitutional and legal matters of official significance.
• defining `employee' as `[a] person in the service of another . . . where the employer has the power or right to control and direct the employee in the material details of how the work is to be performed.
• defining \employee\ as \[a] person in the service of another . . . where the employer has the power or right to control and direct the employee in the material details of how the work is to be performed.\
• defining \employee\ as \[a] person in the service of another . . . where the employer has the power or right to control and direct the employee in the material details of how the work is to be performed.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).