Cash v. Bank of Lowes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that plaintiff “has not shown that the Proposal to Suspend had effects independent of the suspension itself”
• finding that a reasonable jury could discern retaliation based on the combination of temporal proximity and a “budding pattern of antagonism” related to the plaintiff’s prior protected activity
• finding that a reasonable jury could discern retaliation based on the combination of temporal proximity and a \budding pattern of antagonism\ related to the plaintiff's prior protected activity
• noting that suspension “could qualify as a materially adverse action under D.C. Circuit precedent”
• denying summary judgment 18 where there was six-week gap between interview and decision not to hire plaintiff, as well 19 as additional evidence
• finding causation where adverse actions “occurred against a backdrop of a cycle of protected activity and repeated adverse personnel actions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).