Cash Energy, Inc. v. Weiner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiffs claim under 93A based on the failure of a neighboring business which stored chemicals failure to notify plaintiff of the contamination of his property
• “apart from claims of unfair competition, section 11 applies only between parties having some transactional business relationship”
• “When no directly relevant precedents are available to guide this court’s resolution of an issue of interpretation of a state statute, dicta (and even implied dicta) in the state court opinions have substantial weight.”
• “[A] court concluding that a complaint fails particularity requirements either enters an interlocutory order dismissing the complaint, but allowing leave to amend within a specified time, or allows leave to amend and defers ruling on the motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).