Casey's General Stores, Inc. v. Blackford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ICRA requires “an interactive process that engages the employee and employer to work in concert to achieve a reasonable accommodation”
• holding plaintiff must identify a specific position that was available that plaintiff actually sought or desired
• holding plaintiffs must show they were “qualified to perform the job either with or without an accommodation for [their] disability,” concluding a plaintiff’s termination for attendance issues was appropriate
• providing that ICRA “only pronounces a general proscription against discrimination and we have looked to the corresponding federal statutes to help establish the framework to analyze claims and otherwise apply our statute”
• requiring proof that an employee “is qualified to perform the job, with or without an accommodation” as part of an ICRA disability discrimination claim
• stating an employer “has some obligation, based on the employee’s initiation of the process, to reassign a disabled employee . . . as a reasonable accommodation” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).