Casey v. Lucas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “plaintiffs’ claims are premised on the apprehension of future flooding rather than on flooding that has already occurred” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating that the apprehension of future flooding does not effect a taking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).