Skip to main content
· 7/1/1869

Casey v. Le Roy

Citations

  • 38 Cal. 697

Syllabus

<p>Practice.—If the plaintiff anticipate the defense and offer testimony in rebuttal of it, the Court may, in its discretion, refuse to admit, after the defendant has closed his case, further testimony in rebuttal which is merely cumulative.</p>

Judges: Sanderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.