Casey v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in action to recover commission from defaulting purchaser, broker was limited to asserting right to forfeiture of deposit since seller did not satisfy contract provision regarding notice of election to utilize legal rights other than forfeiture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Holzman v. Fiola Blum, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-04-02· cited 40×
• Cogan v. Kidder, Mathews & Segner, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-07-22· cited 23×
• DeFranceaux Realty Group, Inc. v. Leeth
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-10-11· cited 9×
• Sapero & Sapero v. Bel Air Plumbing & Heating Contractors, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-01-16· cited 9×
• Blood v. Gibbons
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-08-18· cited 7×
• Sampson v. McAdoo
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-02-05· cited 4×
• Greentree Series V, Inc. v. Hofmeister
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-29· cited 4×
• Laddon v. Rhett Realty, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-06-07
• Greentree Series V v. Hofmeister
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-29

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barnette v. Sayers
  D.C. Circuit· 1923-05-07· cited 23×
• Sheffield v. Paul T. Stone, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 1938-04-25· cited 18×
• Asher v. Hull
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1952-11-25· cited 15×
• Chasanow v. Willcox
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-06-05· cited 15×
• Meinecke v. Goedeke
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1950-05-12· cited 7×
• Powers v. House
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1952-05-09· cited 2×