Casey v. Cohan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prejudgment interest is assessed “until the date the amount of the fee was fixed”
• concluding that attorney fees incurred defending against a recission counterclaim were a “cost of collection,” reasoning that to “collect on the note,” the debtor “had to defeat the counterclaim”
• concluding that attorney fees incurred defending against a recission counterclaim were a “cost of collection,” reasoning that to “collect on the note,” the debtor “had to defeat the counterclaim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).