Casey v. Briant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the second prong “more often . . . manifests itself as splits among the circuit courts”
• holding “[wjhether interlocutory review ... materially advanee[s] the resolution of [a] case ... depends in large part on considerations of judicial economy and the need to avoid unnecessary delay and expense and piecemeal litigation.”
• “If the Federal Circuit were to affirm this court’s ruling, litigation on the remaining contract claims would still need to proceed.”
• “It is well-accepted that interlocutory appeals under this section are reserved for ‘exceptional’ or ‘rare’ cases and should be authorized only with great care.”
• collecting cases exemplifying each of the grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).