Skip to main content
· 10/23/2013

Casey K. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services

Citations

  • 311 P.3d 637
  • 2013 WL 5770527
  • 2013 Alas. LEXIS 139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that three-week delay by OCS was insufficient to support finding that OCS did not make reasonable efforts
  • holding missed urinalyses and drug-related criminal charges sufficient to support finding children in need of aid under AS 47.10.011(10)
  • explaining that active efforts standard in ICWA cases imposes higher burden on OCS than reasonable efforts standard
  • noting that OCS counted one parent’s missed UAs as failed UAs, and that this evidence could support a CINA finding under AS 47.10.011(10)
  • providing that active efforts standard in ICWA cases imposes “higher burden” on OCS than reasonable efforts standard
  • providing that active efforts standard in ICWA cases imposes higher burden on OCS than reasonable efforts standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Winfree, Stowers, Maassen, Bolger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.