Skip to main content
· 8/3/1979

Case v. Hart Motor Express, Inc.

Citations

  • 283 N.W.2d 514
  • 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1643

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a search incident to a lawful arrest as an exception to the warrant requirement
  • “The only remaining inquiry is whether the appropriate remedy is to suppress the evidence seized. This is a question of law.”
  • \The only remaining inquiry is whether the appropriate remedy is to suppress the evidence seized. This is a question of law.\
  • \The only remaining inquiry is whether the appropriate remedy is to suppress the evidence seized. This is a question of law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.