Case v. Case
Citations
- 17 Cal. 598
Syllabus
<p>In suit for divorce on the ground of adultery, the marriage will not be inferred from matrimonial cohabitation, with the reputation of being married persons, if the result of such inference be to prove defendant guilty of bigamy. In such cases actual marriage must be proven.</p> <p>The one hundred and twenty-first section of the Act concerning Crimes and Punishments, as to proof of marriage in prosecutions for bigamy, does not so change the common law rule as to make mere cohabitationpro of of marriage. This section simply obviates the necessity of proving the marriage by documentary or record evidence.</p>
Judges: Cope
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-01-02· cited 56×
- Kilburn v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-05-07· cited 26×
- Lorimer v. LorimerMichigan Supreme Court· 1900-09-18· cited 18×
- In Re Binger's EstateNebraska Supreme Court· 1954-03-26· cited 15×
- In re the Estate of ErlangerNew York Surrogate's Court· 1932-08-01· cited 15×
- People v. Ah WooCalifornia Supreme Court· 1865-04-15· cited 13×
- People v. PizzuraMichigan Supreme Court· 1920-06-18· cited 11×
- People ex rel. David Stevenson Brewing Co. v. LymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1902-07-01· cited 7×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1885-01-15· cited 5×
- United States v. SimpsonUtah Supreme Court· 1885-06-15· cited 1×
- Stanley v. StanleyNew York Surrogate's Court· 1886-06-15
- People ex rel. David Stevenson Brewing Co. v. LymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1902-01-15
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.