Case Manufacturing Co. v. Soxman
Citations
- 138 U.S. 431
- 11 S. Ct. 360
- 34 L. Ed. 1019
- 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2098
Syllabus
<p>In this case the plaintiff having accepted notes of a limited liability company in settlement, set up that the acceptance was made through a misunderstanding. Held, that evidence tending to show knowledge that the plaintiff at the time of the acceptance was a limited liability company was admissible.</p> <p>When in a case in which the facts are found by the court instead of a jury, there is any evidence tending to support the- finding, this' court will not review it.</p> <p>It appearing from the evidence of one of the plaintiff’s witnesses that during the dates of these transactions he was acting as its financial manager, his acts in that capacity cannot be repudiated.</p>
Judges: Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Woodson CountyEighth Circuit· 1906-03-30· cited 86×
- Shields v. Clifton Hill Land Co.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1894-11-20· cited 38×
- Pueblo v. SuttonSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1911-03-31· cited 24×
- Miller v. WaySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1894-06-13· cited 13×
- Glidden & Joy Varnish Co. v. Interstate Nat. BankEighth Circuit· 1895-09-02· cited 8×
- Quaker Hill, Inc. v. ParrSupreme Court of Colorado· 1961-09-25· cited 5×
- United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Eighth Circuit· 1932-03-15· cited 5×
- Eureka County Bank v. ClarkeNinth Circuit· 1904-05-02· cited 5×
- Paul v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York· 1904-06-24· cited 4×
- Hepburn v. CommissionerBoard of Tax Appeals· 1938-03-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.