Casco Products Corp. v. Hess Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this reasoning does not apply when the contempt is criminal, the purpose of the order then being punitive and not to advance private interests
• noting that this reasoning does not apply when the contempt is criminal, the purpose of the order then being punitive and not to advance private interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-05-02· cited 47×
• Crislip v. Harshman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-22· cited 39×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Beghian v. Beghian
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-09-25· cited 37×
• Simmons v. Simmons
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-02-27· cited 31×
• Rosenberg Appeal
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-06-18· cited 18×
• Capital Bakers, Inc. v. Local Union No. 464 of the Bakery & Confectionary Workers International Union
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-08-22· cited 12×
• Phoenix Glass Co. v. Local Union No. 8381, United Steel Workers of America
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-22· cited 3×
• Lower Southampton Township v. Maloney
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-14· cited 1×
• Commonwealth ex rel. Ziccardi v. Hendricks
  Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1964-05-08

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. United Mine Workers of America
  Supreme Court· 1947-03-06· cited 2,872×
• Knaus v. Knaus
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-12-29· cited 142×
• United States v. Union Supply Co.
  Supreme Court· 1909-11-08· cited 66×
• Milk Control Commission v. McAllister Dairy Farms
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-03-13· cited 14×