Skip to main content
· 11/25/1975

CASCO BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. Rush

Citations

  • 348 A.2d 239
  • 1975 Me. LEXIS 323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it is a function of discovery, and not of a complaint, to provide a defendant with “all material details” of the allegations against them
  • only a “rather generalized statement” is required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dufresne, Pome-Roy, Wernick, Archibald, Delahanty, Weatherbee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.