Cascadia Wildlands v. Bureau of Indian Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “[i]t is undisputed that, generally, FWS recovery plans are not mandatory”
• “It is undisputed that, generally, FWS recovery plans are not mandatory. The Endangered Species Act does not mandate compliance with recovery plans for endangered species.”
• “The Endangered Species Act does not mandate compliance with 14 recovery plans for endangered species.”
• “Minor inconsistencies that reveal nothing about an asylum applicant’s fear for his safety are not an adequate basis for an adverse credibility finding.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• \An agency can take a 'hard look' at cumulative impacts ... by ... incorporating the expected impact of [a forthcoming] project into the environmental baseline against which the incremental impact of a proposed project is measured.\
• “The Endangered Species Act does not mandate compliance with recovery plans for endangered species.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).