Cascadia Lumber Co. v. Oregon State Highway Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[s]ince the entire record is not before this court for review, we must presume that the proof presented below was sufficient to support the trial court’s decision to order a new trial on all the issues”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).