Skip to main content
· 9/16/1985

Cascade Pacific International v. The United States

Citations

  • 773 F.2d 287
  • 33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,958
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that reproeured spring hinges were the same as or similar to defaulted spring hinges because the former “were plated and otherwise met the requirements of the specifications” of the defaulted contract
  • stating that the government, like any other party, is entitled to receive what it contracted for
  • noting that the similarity between the services is “demonstrated by comparing the item reprocured with the item specified in the original contract.”
  • “The third condition requires that the Government act within a reasonable time of the default, use the most efficient method of reprocurement, obtain a reasonable price, and mitigate its losses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldwin, Kashiwa, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.