Cascade Auto Glass v. PROGRESSIVE CAS. INS.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to find contract illusory even though consumer only committed to paying a “fair” price because “both parties clearly intended the [] agreement to be binding”
• “Whether particular notice was reasonable is ordinarily a question of fact for the jury.”
• “[T]he party wishing to terminate the agreement must give reasonable notice to the other party.”
• “When a contract for a continuing performance fails to specify the intended duration, we construe it to be terminable-at-will by either party after a reasonable time” upon “giv[ing] reasonable notice to the other party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).