Casanova v. American Airlines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that Clemons “rejected an argument that but‐for causation is enough to establish retaliatory discharge” and that Grabs v. Safeway, Inc., 917 N.E.2d 122 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009), and Finnerty 6 No. 13‐2199 v. Personnel Board, 707 N.E.2d 600 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999
• “Casanova’s claim of injury (which implied that sooner or later he would want workers’ compensation benefits) was a necessary condition of the discharge. But it was not a sufficient condition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).