Casa Orlando Apartments, Ltd. v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs “survey here fails to show that burden of proof standards do not vary or that differences in state unjust enrichment laws are insignificant”
• applying Restatement § 145 to breach of fiduciary duty claim and concluding that injury “occurred in the states where plaintiffs maintain their principal places of business”
• affirming denial of class certification where plaintiffs failed \to demonstrate that state law variations\ did not defeat predominance
• affirming denial of class certification where plaintiffs failed “to demonstrate that state law variations” did not defeat predominance
• applying Restatement § 145 to breach of fiduciary duty claim and concluding that injury “occurred in the states where plaintiffs maintain their principal places of business”
• denying Rule 23(b)(1)(A) certification because preliminary questions of state law determined whether defendant was a fiduciary to individual plaintiffs, so no risk of dissimilar outcomes creating conflicting standards of conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).