Cas. Ins. Co. v. Northbrook Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that phrase “arising out of operations performed for the additional insured by the named insured” covered additional insured for its own negligence
• phrase \arising out of operations performed for the additional insured by the name insured\ covered the additional insured for its own negligence
• even though subcontractor was not named as a defendant in the underlying action, subcontractor’s named insured was allowed to maintain a declaratory action for a breach of the duty to defend
• since the subcontractor was performing operations pursuant to its contract with the general contractor at the time the injuries occurred, liability will arise out of operation performed by the subcontractor for the general contractor, the additional insured
• since the subcontractor was performing operations pursuant to its contract with the general contractor at the time the injuries occurred, liability will arise out of operation performed by the subcontractor for the general contractor, the additional insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).