Cary v. Keene Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that: \[a]n unsubstantiated assertion is not sufficient to overcome the effect of ... prior testimony\
• stating general rule that a party “may not repudiate or contradict by affidavit his previous deposition testimony” and noting exception
• error to exclude affidavit naming défen-dant’s product where witness initially said he “could not recall specific brand names of the products he had used” but “was later able to recall the names of several of Keene’s products after a careful review of a products list”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).