Skip to main content
· 3/30/2000

Cary Oil Co., Inc. v. MG Refining and Marketing

Citations

  • 90 F. Supp. 2d 401
  • 90 F. Supp. 401
  • 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 814
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3894
  • 2000 WL 334819

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[r]ecission [sic] necessarily is included in amendment, waiver or departure” and “[therefore, the [Contracts] prohibit not only modification, but also rescission.”
  • finding contract and implied covenant claims redundant where they “clearly rest[ed] on the same factual predicate-Deutsche Bank’s alleged involvement in 1995 CFTC order”
  • “[A] claim for breach of the implied covenant will be dismissed as duplicative if the conduct allegedly violating the implied covenant is also the predicate for breach of the underlying contract.”
  • “If the breach is material and the breaching party fails to cure.... ” (emphasis added)
  • “[T]he statute of limitations for failure to perform [does] not begin to run [even in the case of an anticipatory breach] until the time fixed for performance. The UCC appears to have adopted this approach.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.