· 5/24/1905
Cary Mfg. Co. v. De Haven
Citations
- 139 F. 262
- 71 C.C.A. 388
- 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3877
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that a lack of objectors is less telling when the average recovery is relatively small
- involving a class or 75,000 people, where e-mail notice was utilized for 51,000 people and traditional mail notice for the rest
- involving a class or 75,000 people, where e-mail notice was utilized for 51,000 people and traditional mail notice for the rest
- approving settlement agreement that “represented] closef] to 13% of plaintiffs’ best possible recovery” and under which “Claimants w[ould] receive a pro rata share of the fund based on the amount of ... fees they paid during the class period”
- approving settlement agreement that “represent[ed] close[] to 13% of plaintiffs’ best possible recovery” and under which “Claimants w[ould] receive a pro rata share of the fund based on the amount of . . . fees they paid during the class period”
- deeming 29% a “very high participation rate”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.