Skip to main content
· 5/24/1905

Cary Mfg. Co. v. De Haven

Citations

  • 139 F. 262
  • 71 C.C.A. 388
  • 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that a lack of objectors is less telling when the average recovery is relatively small
  • involving a class or 75,000 people, where e-mail notice was utilized for 51,000 people and traditional mail notice for the rest
  • involving a class or 75,000 people, where e-mail notice was utilized for 51,000 people and traditional mail notice for the rest
  • approving settlement agreement that “represented] closef] to 13% of plaintiffs’ best possible recovery” and under which “Claimants w[ould] receive a pro rata share of the fund based on the amount of ... fees they paid during the class period”
  • approving settlement agreement that “represent[ed] close[] to 13% of plaintiffs’ best possible recovery” and under which “Claimants w[ould] receive a pro rata share of the fund based on the amount of . . . fees they paid during the class period”
  • deeming 29% a “very high participation rate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.