Carver v. Bond/Fayette/Effingham Regional Board of School Trustees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that courts of review must not “read into the statute a substantive change the legislature did not see fit to make” under the “guise” of statutory construction
• finding a loss of one-half of 1% in assessed valuation or between $1,300 and $1,500 in property tax revenues de minimis
• further determining that there was no evidence that the children in that case “ha[d] ties to that area or that this in any way facilitates the students’ involvement in school or extracurricular activities”
• further determining that there was no evidence that the children in that case “ha[d] ties to that area or that this in any way facilitates the students’ involvement in school or extracurricular activities”
• current version at NRS 422.29302(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).