Caruth v. Texas & Pacific Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plain language of the Federal Trade Commission Act “confirms the framers’ intent to allow exercise of [substantive rulemaking] power”
• holding that the plain language of the FTC Act “confirm[ed] the framers’ intent to allow [the] exercise of [substantive rulemaking] power”
• holding that the Federal Trade Commission Act conferred substantive rulemaking powers
• holding that the Federal Trade Commission Act conferred substantive rulemaking powers
• finding that FTC has rule-making authority despite the agency’s lack of historical exercise of that authority
• recognizing the efficiency that accrues to rulemaking proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).