Cartwright v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the construction of statutes is a job for the courts, and courts should assign statutory language its ordinary, common, and logical meaning, absent clear evidence that a contrary meaning was intended; in addition, application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marsengill v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-10-13· cited 4×
• Glanton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-01-08· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Integon Indemnity Corporation v. Canal Insurance Company
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1987-02-24· cited 55×
• Earth Management, Inc. v. Heard County
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-10-27· cited 53×
• Curlee v. Mock Enterprises, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-01-29· cited 44×
• SOUTHERN INTERMODAL LOGISTICS, INC. v. Coleman
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-09-09· cited 12×
• Smith v. Hiawassee Hardware Co.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-05-24· cited 12×
• Sowards v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-01-29· cited 6×
• Hardeman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-04-16· cited 5×
• Cearley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-11-22· cited 1×