Cartwright v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[the amendment] does not permit the expert to make claims that are unsupported by the expert’s basis and methodology”
• “It is well settled that a causation opinion based solely on a temporal relationship is not derived from the scientific method and is therefore insufficient to satisfy the requirements of [Federal Rule of Evidence] 702.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).