Cartwright v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court engaged in OEC 403 balancing even though it did not expressly discuss its analysis
• concluding that, “[i]n context, the trial court’s statement is sufficient for us to conclude that it balanced the probative value of the [evidence] against the danger of unfair prejudice”
• concluding that, “[i]n context, the trial court’s statement is sufficient for us to conclude that it balanced the probative value of the [evidence] against the danger of unfair prejudice”
• holding that a trial court makes a sufficient record to support a discretionary ruling when the ruling, considered in light of the parties’ arguments, demon- strates that the court evaluated the appropriate consider- ations
• inferring that the trial court engaged in OEC 403 balanc- ing even though it did not expressly discuss the concepts implicit in that analysis
• affirming trial court’s OEC 403 ruling because “we could determine from the record that the trial court had considered and weighed [the OEC 403] factors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).