Cartmell v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Expert testimony is ... relevant not because of the expert’s own opinions-which are likely to diverge widely-but because that testimony may shed light on what constitutes minimally acceptable standards across the profession.”
• adopting Justice Blackmun’s concurring opinion in Youngberg
• retarded children in state custody

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).