Skip to main content
· 1/22/2009

Cartier v. SEAH LLC

Citations

  • 598 F. Supp. 2d 422
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13373
  • 2009 WL 186386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding distribution of magazines on flights in New York and one sale to a New York customer established “the minimum contacts required to ensure that haling plaintiffs into this Court comports with due process” in trademark infringement case
  • “the fact that the purchaser happened to be an investigator in plaintiffs’ employ does not go to the question whether [defendant] purposefully availed itself of the privilege of doing business in New York” and is “irrelevant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis A. Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.